256 Comments
User's avatar
Danita Hamilton's avatar

Exactly well said Brian.Those 8 democrats are weak and just slapped America and the American people in the face. The Republicans will not give them shit because all they do is lie over and over. They all looked pathetic and like weak traitors while they were trying to justify what they did on news outlets like Fox and Morning Joe. We need more people in charge like AOC, Jasmine and Maxwell. Chuck and the rest like them needs to go. And people like Fetterman love trump and shouldn’t even be called a democrat.

Expand full comment
2peter's avatar

What they secured with their deal includes: 1) forcing Senators and House members to go on the record of where they stand; 2) reducing hardship for the American people (including 42 million people on foodstamps); and 3) moving the more important next shutdown into the campaign season for House members AFTER their vote, which is the first opportunity for anything meaningful to occur- voting them out. Schumer played his hand as best he could, but it was never a winning hand, including because it actually advanced Trump's desire to have the government no longer serve the people in any meaningful way.

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

They had millions upon millions of Americans as "their winning hand". WE were their hand, and they ignored it. I get there was suffering - I'm not stupid.

The choices were two: Months of suffering or years of suffering and the Dems chose years of suffering for us - AFTER we made it crystal fucking clear what we wanted.

Expand full comment
Maryann Paradise's avatar

it wasn't just suffering, it was dying without medical care and complete destitution. By the way, months of suffering and dying is not a picnic. It's so easy to sit in your warm homes eating dinner with your family, BUT, if you were in the shoes of the real human beings' who must go through this type of life, you wouldn't be so

" f--k--g" clear as to what you wanted.

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

Oh, no, I think watching suffering and dying from the comfort of my own home is a joy to watch /s. Those human beings for whom you feel such empathy? I do too. Just wait though. You think Trump was cruel when he was backed against the wall? Wait until he's got free rein and there's nothing stopping him.

It's the lesser of two evils, Maryann. I'm not stupid. I understand complete destitution. The question was, do we want 6 months of complete destitution or 6 years. Let's hope there are actual midterms in 2026, because if you think Trump and his gang of fascists are cruel now, just think gas ovens and mass graves three years from now when he takes the mid-terms and his Project 2025 team has four years to dial up the suffering.

And for the g-d record, I am a real human being who was taking care of families in real need to help them through this crisis. I was f'n donating PET FOOD so that children could keep their pets. Don't preach to me.

Expand full comment
This Must Be Said's avatar

They GO BACK AT THIS IN DECEMBER, PEOPLE!

Expand full comment
laura b's avatar

Could it also be said that Republicans caved to 5 Democrats, given the concessions that were gained as described above? Democrats are dealing with a mentally disordered Trump and his cultish Republicans. He enjoys the cruelty-leverage for his Un American ideas. He has no agenda. Republicans have hated ACA for years. They offer no alternative plan.

So, now we need to stop licking our wounds and continue the fight. Grousing only points the blame at Democrats. Republicans: “See, even Dems admit they’re losers.” Get back up. As long as Trump is head of the govt., there will be an uneven playing field. We must see the big picture, not individual partisan losses.

Expand full comment
Paula Dean's avatar

I agree with you, Laura. Those 8 are not up for re-election and had little to lose. Also, tRump didn't want the shutdown to end - he was planning to use the extended shutdown to force his own agenda. He was going to force the end of the filibuster so he could grab more power and destroy the midterms.

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

Who needs a filibuster when you have Senate Democrats who'll cave to anything? See that? Midterms? Do you honestly think we're going to have fair midterms?

Expand full comment
laura b's avatar

*8 Dems 🤦🏼‍♀️

Expand full comment
Jose's avatar

Yes those are all good points and BTC referenced the positive. But by taking this version of a "deal" they legitimized the tactic of withholding funds for food and firing thousands as leverage. I agree this shutdown needed to end sooner than later and any victory would have been small compared to all the carnage this administration has already inflicted. But it sounds like Republicans were willing to include temporary extensions for the aca. Something some house Republicans are interested in as well. Even if it didn't ultimately pass it would have shown the American people that the democrats are playing hard ball. The Republicans still would own the Healthcare fiasco and the rest of it. We had leverage in the form of voters coalescing around the republican shutdown. They are in control of the governement and allowed things to get this bad. Instead we will kick this can and the next time have zero credibility or leverage. Do we think the threat of eliminating the filibuster scared schumer into this? I kind-of do.

Expand full comment
trisha-lynn's avatar

Your perspective is… interesting. Why do you think none of the other Dems signed on? Including Schumer?

Expand full comment
Lori's avatar

Because schumer wanted to try to keep his own ass clean, by going after the 8 dems (not currently capitalized) who were either retiring, not going for a re election, or not worried about being primaried since they are not due upfor at least 3 more years. But we will NOT FORGET what these 8 and AND schumer have done to us and how betrayed we all feel right now.

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

This is twice Schumer has done this to us. Even my own two Dem Senators from GEORGIA were in on it, but Ossoff is vulnerable in '26. I wrote him, was not kind, and told him to send my campaign contribution back. Let that mf sell one of gd houses to pay for his reelection campaign. I stretched my budget thin because as BTC wrote, "We had the wind at our backs."

Expand full comment
Emily Cassell's avatar

Im confused by your comment. Ossof is vulnerable, true. But, he was not one of the 8 Dems to cave. So, why are you so disgusted with him? What have I missed? So far as I've seen, he's a rising star. Intelligent, focused, and a great communicator.

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

Because it was every other Dem Senators' job to hold the line, and to convince the eight with nothing to lose in '26 to hold the line with them. They promised - all of them - to fight for us, and just a few days after they secured two governor's seats and a few other crucial state seats, they caved. The timing of this couldn't be more obvious. They had Democrats voting in races they normally wouldn't even have known about, and because they wanted to stand up to the Republicans. What other way can we send the message to them other than by calling, emailing, marching, and VOTING?

And yes, Ossoff is intelligent, poised, a great speaker, but he lacks passion and he fails to see the greater picture.

Each and every Senators' vote effects each and every American. Ossoff isn't just for Georgia when he votes, like Kaine isn't just for Virginia. They're great on podcasts, videos, interviews, but they all let us down in the end, Emily.

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

Bullshit. Winning and losing hands? All politicians seem to be shit and not real leaders. However, no real loss for me as I’m neither a leader nor a follower but just an observer watching this scorpion dance of humanity.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 11
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
ChezyT's avatar

They may have food and no health care. However, more may need food stamps if faced with catastrophic medical costs and or sky-high insurance premiums.

Expand full comment
MikiD's avatar

"We need more people in charge like AOC, Jasmine and Maxwell." Yes, yes and yes! We need get the spineless politicians out of office.

Expand full comment
VJ Grimes's avatar

It had to be done—food. Instead of playing game of hollering at party faithful for opening, use opening to DO the things Dems say they’d do. Impeach and I figure “this” looks like some sort of trade-off. Open and impeach.

Expand full comment
Doreen Garza's avatar

I agree 100%

Expand full comment
Pamela Mendenhall-Howard's avatar

Danita.....I am angry that the democrats caved again! Yes I understand why they did. This is why I believe we need age and term limits for all elected officials including the Supreme Court. Our forefathers did not intend for the House and Senate to be a career and no more lifetime positions!

This why I support David Hogg's Leaders We Deserve. He is finding younger people to run for City, State and Federal positions in Government. We need to primary the seat warmers and vote in more people like AOC, Jasmine Crockett, The Squad, etc. who will fight for we the people.

Once the democrats have control of the House and Senate they can impeach trump, his regime and the 6 on the Supreme Court. They can also reverse/repair the damage trump has done to our freedom, democracy, her people, our country and our Allies.

Also do we really believe that they will bring to the floor the ACA subsidies vote in December? AND if they do, do think that it will pass the House and the Senate? I think not! trump already said he would not sign a bill into law if it had the ACA subsidies in the bill. So we lost our chance.

Expand full comment
salletucson@gmail.com's avatar

Would we elect, as Dems, an open white supremacist? An unrelenting misogynist? Why then should we support a declared Antisemitic?

We need new blood, not old hate.

A big YES on Jasmine!

Fetterman just had another stroke and I fear that's what made him change completely, but still needs to go.

Expand full comment
GenXOceanLover's avatar

The Progressives ARE gaining traction. With the exception of Schumer the Hateful 8 are not running or are retiring & I can bet they got a real nice monetary exit package. The Hateful 8 are not the whole party. And they even know it’s not their game anymore. For instance Pelosi has just agreed to retire and we have some great progressive candidates that are running for her position. We have to support the progressive what other choice do we have we don’t support progressive Democrats and then Trump and his fascist regime wins. And that’s simply not an option so we fight on.

Expand full comment
Change Champion's avatar

This def was something Schumer put in motion. He convinced these 8 bc they are not up for re-election next year. Plus, how many of them were getting money from the airlines?

We definitely need new blood for the Democrats. These old established democrats do not know how to fight.

Expand full comment
Slack System's avatar

Or worse, they do and choose not to

Expand full comment
Lori's avatar

Yes, I too wondered who was giving the payoffs, and you know somebody sure was.. Airlines are a good best, because with the holidays coming up people generally fly much more, and currently with the condition of the Air Traffic Control, people are scared to fly now. This regime has shown repeatedly how they do not hire any talented staff, so whats makes us think the goofy road warrior hiring new and more ATC will make us any safer?

Expand full comment
Leigh Hamilton's avatar

I agree with you. I think the airline situation was a big factor. By all means we can't have a huge industry lose large amounts of money! /s.

Expand full comment
salletucson@gmail.com's avatar

Not Schumer's work! Pressure from their states big businesses. Airplanes, federal workers, farmers, etc

Expand full comment
Mary Otterson Ameln's avatar

Do not be like The Eight Losers!

Expand full comment
The_Mad_Catter_'s avatar

The Traitorous 8!

Expand full comment
Ss's avatar

So extremely disappointed in, and pissed at, the spineless 7 who caved. Fetterman is not worth mentioning. We can take care of them when their terms are up. They are total cowards. Disgustingly so. And each coward needs to go.

Expand full comment
Michelle Nee's avatar

Those 8 are either retiring or NOT running for reelection. There is nothing we can do to them except hang their cowardly heads on the wall of shame for all eternity so that everyone will know them for the losers they are!

Expand full comment
Scooterboi60's avatar

I’m afraid that American democracy is irrevocably lost. That a criminal was elected to the presidency the first time round was a gobsmacker.

That he was given so much publicity after he was forced out of the White House during all of his trials was ridiculous.

To vote him back in after telling you everything he would do is utter lunacy.

America has now been totally and utterly fuc*ed because of Schumer and the senate.

Expand full comment
Rose Lynn Hawkins's avatar

I wonder if they were paid to vote yes

Expand full comment
Danita Hamilton's avatar

Me too they really don’t have nothing to lose except a couple I think because there retiring so they don’t give a damn and Fetterman said from the beginning it was the democrats fault his own party he is straight up a trump lover

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

More or less no one in PA voted for Fetterman. They voted against his Republican competition. Fetterman, you might recall, had a stroke during the campaign. Under normal and reasonable circumstances, no one would vote for someone like that.

Expand full comment
Danita Hamilton's avatar

The point is he is still a traitor all of them are don’t know what happened behind closed doors all I know they folded after 40 days and I’m sick of these democrats who can’t have a backbone and don’t stand up to these nuts

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

Of course he's a traitor. Pennsylvanians didn't have a chance to find someone better.

It's not a backbone Dems don't have. It's enough of a number of votes. McConnell is out parading himself around claiming Donnie is a horrible person who is unfit for office. Donnie wouldn't be there but for McConnell, who controlled enough Senate votes to refuse to convict Donnie in impeachment, twice, and to install terrible SCOTUS justices. He had the numbers. We couldn't stop him.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

I have seen allusions to that possibility, too, but I have not seen any itemization of who might have paid them, and why. For the moment, as natural as it is to consider such a possibility, I have to consider it a conspiracy theory. I have also read that there more than eight who were willing to vote to end the shutdown, but only eight were needed, so the others voted against. One observation is that none of the eight has re-election around the corner. As if the voting public would forget by the time these eight have to run for re-election. (As if their competition wouldn't remind the voters.) But one of the Senators who was mentioned as theoretically willing to vote to end it was Ossoff, who's campaigning desperately for next year. So the theories are not consistent.

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

I wondered the same thing. Fetterman is out for himself.

Expand full comment
Maria pickworthmaria@gmail.com's avatar

And that is the problem with America everything seems to hinge on money in particular in politics.

Expand full comment
Terry Grogan's avatar

Nonsense

Expand full comment
Dawn Davis's avatar

Thank you for putting into words what I could not articulate because I am too angry to think clearly. I am so very tired of it all.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

Mr Cohen, under the conditions of the shutdown, which was the longest in American history, government didn't "function" (as much as it ever functions now), no one got their ACA extension, many were furloughed, there was no food assistance, and various other people suffered various other disadvantages. You and I work. We have income or savings. We eat every day. That wasn't true for some people during the shutdown.

I appreciate the passion and the intention to fight Republicans, but we are outnumbered, and we're losing the fight. We're losing the fight in one way for ourselves, and we're losing it more critically for people whose fundamental life-sustaining means don't get met. During that shutdown, Republicans lost a noteworthy collection of elections. That didn't get their attention. They don't care. As you pointed out, even their master deflects the damage, so he doesn't have to change his behavior.

I don't know if those eight Senators, or any others who might have agreed to re-open the government, could have had a way to canvass their constituents, to see what they wanted, and how they were holding up, and how much longer they could manage.

But one way to look at it is that a guarantee of medical access was sacrificed for a guarantee of a job, and an income, and food. People don't often need medical access. We all need to eat every day. I think it could be argued that Dem Senators held out long enough, and made their point. Last week's elections make clear that voters got the point. Republicans are never going to respond to that. They genuinely don't care. They'll be scratching their heads a year from now when they get voted out of office. In the meantime, I read one e-mail explanation from Tim Kaine, saying roughly what I said, and Dem Senators can now spend their time explaining themselves, and canvassing. If they find out they guessed wrong, and the public could have held out longer, and would have been willing to do that, they'll get another chance in January. But the public isn't you and I. We can manage. The public is people who don't work, or work without being paid, and are at pains to eat. The medical access tragedy is a collection of problems, and it will take a new government -- one that cares -- to try to understand the problems, and address them.

Expand full comment
Alex Chejlyk's avatar

I understand that this shutdown was extremely painful for millions. Now, our healthcare costs will soar because the heinous 8 capitulated to Trump. The Dems weren't holding the American's hostage, the GOP were. Sure, the Dems could give up and cede all power to the GOP, what could go wrong?. Why should the GOP negotiate in the future with a weaker entity? The GOP have shown that they have no empathy, so they will just keep stomping all over US citizens and the Democratic party will just say 'please stop' and then roll over. All hail king trump...

Edited because 'seed' was incorrect, 'cede' is the correct term.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

How often do you access medical services? How often do you eat?

You are exactly right: Republicans were holding America and Americans hostage. They could. They had the numbers. As Brian Cohen and others commonly point out, they hurt their own base more than they hurt everyone else. They very simply don't care. You're right, you're right, you're right: they have no empathy (they expressly view it as a weakness and a failing), and it pleases them to stomp over everyone.

It's cede, not seed.

Republicans won't have to negotiate anything in the future. They are vigorously committing suicide right now.

Expand full comment
Margaret's avatar

I understand and agree with your point, Fred. I access medical care much less often than food. But a few years ago I had some serious medical problems and the bills added up to over a $million. That's a lot of food. Just sayin'.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

Absolutely right. The American medical industry is a horrible mess, and it needs someone's very serious attention. But the vast majority of people do not rack up $1M+ in medical bills, and everybody has to eat every day.

As I said, I think Dems did a good job of making their point, at least for now. They just have to continue to ride this bucking bronco (which is the job they requested and get paid well to do), and we've now seen that the public/voters are getting the message.

Expand full comment
Margaret's avatar

Thanks.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

By the way, Margaret, my younger brother died of cancer in 2019. He was in his early 60s, and he was a lawyer. So he liked to argue. He was also very irresponsible, and he had no medical insurance of any kind. (He didn't make it to 65, when he would have had Medicare. I think. At the end, when he couldn't work, I went to the local Social Security office to see if I could get him disability. They said he didn't qualify, because he had never paid into Social Security. The mischief that boy made.

He had the cancer for a couple of years or so, and it metastasized. There were ER visits, chemotherapy, one operation to remove a metastatic lesion from his brain, and radiation therapy. He always went to the same hospital.

He discovered early on that the hospital had deals with insurance companies, and it charged insured patients less than it charged uninsured ones. So he told them that if they were willing to offer treatment at the discounted rate to insured patients, that's what he was willing to pay. Which he never did.

I have no idea how high was his unpaid hospital bill. Maybe like what your adventure cost you or some insurance company. And it's all highly inflated.

Expand full comment
Maria pickworthmaria@gmail.com's avatar

There are always two sides to it even in this case yes they should not have yielded. However their were millions of people going hungry and would they in the end have said thank you Dems for your fight but you also did not feed us.

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

That's a different version of my point. You were just a lot more concise.

Expand full comment
Bob Seemueller's avatar

Democrat's only asked for ONE THING, Affordable healthcare thru the ACA. They caved. Welcome to an authoritarian dictatorship without accountability, that doesn't care about 350 million American's. We revisit all this BS at the end of January 26 but with the ACA gone..

Expand full comment
Fred Jonas's avatar

Dems only asked for one thing, because there was only one thing they weren't given. I've said before, and I'll say again, we're outnumbered. We did what we could have done, which was shut down the government. That didn't have major implications for me personally. Maybe it didn't for you. It did for many people. And what those eight Senators had to decide for tens of millions of people was whether it was more important to extend the ACA, or more important to continue SNAP. I'm old enough to have received Medicare for the past 10 years. For myself, I don't care about the ACA. I know many other people do. But every one of us cares about food access, and tens of millions of people don't eat without SNAP. I would venture to say that most of those people don't have active medical problems for which they need attention on a frequent basis, or at all.

It was a calculation we pay Senators a lot of money to do. They held out a long time. Many Dem candidates and initiatives got elected last week. Reps are too intoxicated, and too stupid, to see where this is going for them. That's their problem. Dem Sens did what they felt they could do, and they made an impressive point. Reps will of course work harder now, to prevent Dems from voting. But to the extent they don't succeed, or even alienate their own base more, it's all going to come crashing down on them next year, as it did last week. And they won't just be watching it. They'll be packing their stuff, and going home. Because Dem Sens shut down the government for 40 days, and gave everyone a clearer view as to who their friends are.

Expand full comment
Kathy Kensmoe's avatar

👁️ I see this differently. I am not putting the Dems “Yes” in the same bucket as the election wins. The wins were a glorious reality check on what America WANTS. Going hungry; rising healthcare, or no healthcare; federal workers going without pay; near miss collisions with aircraft are cruel and insane!

This CLEARLY shows who REALLY cares about the American people. It is NOT the current facist regime. So, if some people see what the Dems did as spineless, I see it as strength in the midst of a raging storm. DEMS want what is GOOD for the people. Trump will burn things to the ground to get his own way. They DONT CARE if people go hungry, or can’t pay their mortgages. All they

care about is WINNING. This will AGAIN show America WHO has their back, when after all this… NOTHING is done to improve healthcare. In the end, LOVE conquers. The “loyalists” in Congress have all just screwed themselves BY doing what they have just done. Their EGREGIOUS actions will never be forgotten. It is already history. America will prevail. Goodness and fairness will prevail.

Expand full comment
Leigh Blake's avatar

Thank you for some positivity!!! It's difficult, but we've got to STAY ALIVE...and work towards DEMOCRATIC ENDS!! Keep the faith...no negativity!!

Expand full comment
Dawn Davis's avatar

I really hope so, but I am not feeling at all hopeful for the future of our country.

Expand full comment
Kimmy Win's avatar

Well said, BTC. I feel skeptical, though, that the Epstein files will ever be released. 🙁

Expand full comment
Jeff Meese's avatar

What files?

Trump the Guilty operates like the mob boss and threatens everyone and everything to get his way especially to re write history. The spineless traitors to the oaths they took saw what has happened to Cheney and Kinzinger. It costs big money to defend yourself from baseless lawsuits whether you win or lose. That, can be punishment enough. Look what is happening to Comey and his daugther.

The Epstein files? I too doubt that they will ever see the light of day. A whole bunch of very powerful people are involved and the main witness, Maxwell has been silenced.

Expand full comment
Leigh Blake's avatar

They might've already been destroyed...has anyone else thought this??

Expand full comment
Maryann Paradise's avatar

they will, things are coming into view, slowly, but I hope and pray it's soon. The people involved in this horrific, life destroying, evil will finally have to pay. People seem to be coming forward and ONCE we dig deeper and try to ignore the many "distractions", the truth will emerge, I pray.

Expand full comment
Marcia's avatar

I agree but when the ACA subsidies go for a vote Americans will see for themselves that it is the republicans who vote against them…..that will be a concrete fact going into midterms

Expand full comment
Joseph P Popp's avatar

Where is Amy Schumer? She needs to explain to her uncle. That he needs to go lay down on some beach in Florida and take a nap 💤 We need some young bucks in the leadership of The Democratic Party. AOC comes to mind. Besides she is nice on the eyes 👀. I can hear her saying: Go lay down Chuck, Go lay down. That’s a good boy.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Y Griffiths's avatar

You are so right. The Democrats need new blood. This was totally ridiculous. I am still in shock that they caved😠

Expand full comment
Leigh Blake's avatar

We've got GREAT blood!! If you watch and listen we've got a whole crew of people who've been fighting since BEFORE day one...It's not just AOC, ,Jasmine Crockett, Cory Booker, Senator Whitehouse, Governors Priztger, Newsome, ( sorry for misspellings) and Kotek. Too many are working hard..Senator Merkley is, from our state of Oregon and all I ask is what are any of us doing besides griping??? It's NOT just voting and marching!! it's pitching in too!! Join your local GRASSROOTS groups..we are here in Oregon meeting and calling to get our folks involved..IT TAKES ALL OF US!!!

We KNEW the job was going to be tough.... IF you whine and give up now...you are only proving what the Republicans THINK about us!!

Expand full comment
Sharon Otstot's avatar

I'm so glad I'm an Indie and that my senators, Kelly and Gallegos, didn't shame us.

Expand full comment
Rosalba Cofer's avatar

The "formula" for Citizens United enables Republicans to be boldly corrupt and Democrats to throw the fight. Either way monied interests get their way. Corporate Democrats and Republicans beholding to donors over Americans must go. #SchumerMustGo

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett AR OK VA PA NY's avatar

I've read several analyses of the debacle perpetrated by the 8 cowards with nothing to lose. Some were full of disdain; some attempted optimism. Having weighed all those opinions as I've drawn my own conclusion, it is this: Turds do not have silver linings.

I would hope there's a way to punish them, but I doubt it. I suspect Strongly-Worded-Letter Schumer organized this affair, then voted "no" to give himself cover, so don't expect him to discipline the turncoats.

The tragedy is that millions of people suffered anxiety and financial hardship. For nothing.

And knowing what we know about Donald and his party, the temporary suffering their hostages just experienced will soon be made permanent.

If only there was a real hell ...

Expand full comment